| Credible |
vs. |
Non-Credible |
|
| |
| URL: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Credible.
Does the author: |
| |
Include
links to other reputable sources? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
site
his/her information sources so that the facts presented can be easily checked? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
show
all sides of the issue? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Non-Credible.
Does the author: |
| |
show
bias? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
use
stereotypes? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
use
passionate and/or inflammatory language? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
urge
you to act immediately or make a decission in his/her favor? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
have
something to gain by convincing you? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
Include
obvious advertising on the site? |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
use
vague references as 'proof' such as "4 out of 5 doctors recommend Crest…." |
Yes |
No |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Location
of the information: |
| |
Is the site
a .com, .org, or .edu? |
.com |
.org |
.edu |
| |
|
|
|
|
| Conclussion. Is
the source credible or non-credible? |
|
|
| |
| If it is not as
credible as it could be, what would it take to make it more credible? |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |